The Risks of Self-Managing Your Homeowners Association

In this article

Watercolor illustration: volunteer buried in invoices and a ringing phone at a dining table.

Self-managing your homeowners association saves the cost of a management company, but it puts every legal, financial and administrative task on volunteers. The main risks of a self-managed HOA are missed legal requirements, weak financial controls, inconsistent rule enforcement and volunteer burnout. None of these is inevitable. Plenty of associations manage themselves well, and this article covers both the risks and the conditions under which self-management works.

The Foundation for Community Association Research estimates that 30 to 40 percent of community associations are self-managed, meaning they may use professional help for specific projects and services but do not employ a professional manager or management company. So self-management is common. The question for your board is whether it fits your community.

The risks of a self-managed HOA

List of seven risks of a self-managed HOA, each with a way to reduce it: missed legal requirements, disputes, reliance on few volunteers, weak financial controls, conflicts of interest, no buffer and no single contact.

Share this infographic: Pinterest · Facebook · LinkedIn · Email · Download

Missing a legal requirement

No board sets out to break the law. The trouble is that an association is subject to a long list of rules that volunteers may never have heard of: state statutes on meetings, elections, budgets, disclosures, records and collections, corporate filings, tax returns, fair housing law, and the association’s own governing documents. A professional manager deals with these every day. A volunteer board has to learn them, build a calendar of deadlines, and keep that knowledge alive as directors come and go.

A manager can reduce this risk but does not remove it. Managers are not attorneys, and the board remains responsible for compliance whether or not it hires one.

More exposure to disputes and lawsuits

When a board is unsure of its duties, it is more likely to skip a required notice, apply a rule unevenly or make a decision outside its authority. Those are the kinds of missteps that lead to disputes with owners and, sometimes, to lawsuits. Litigation is expensive and stressful even when the association wins.

Hiring a manager is not a shield against being sued. What protects a board is following the governing documents and the law, documenting its decisions, treating owners consistently, carrying directors and officers insurance, and asking the association’s attorney before acting on anything uncertain. A self-managed board can do all of that.

Operations that depend on a few volunteers

Running an association takes time: paying bills, answering owners, supervising vendors, preparing meeting notices and minutes, getting bids and following up on violations. Directors have jobs and families, and not every board includes someone with experience running an organization. When one or two people carry the load, tasks slip, and when those people move away or burn out, their knowledge leaves with them. Recruiting replacements gets harder when the job is known to be all-consuming.

Weak financial controls

In a self-managed association the treasurer may collect assessments, pay the bills and reconcile the bank accounts alone. That is a lot of trust to place in one person, and it makes both honest errors and theft harder to catch. Budgeting and reserve planning can suffer too if nobody on the board is comfortable with the numbers.

Conflicts of interest and self-serving decisions

Every director is also an owner and a neighbor, so personal interests are never far away. Most directors act for the good of the community. Some are tempted to push a pet project, go easy on a friend’s violation or steer a contract toward someone they know. When other owners notice, tension spreads quickly in a place where everyone lives next door to each other.

A management company does not cure this, because the board still makes the decisions, although a manager can bring consistency to how rules are applied. The real safeguards are a written conflict of interest policy and directors who step aside when they have a personal stake.

No buffer in disputes

Enforcing rules means that, sooner or later, a director has to tell a neighbor to move the trailer or repaint the fence. That is uncomfortable, and personal history can make it worse. A manager can act as a buffer by sending the letters and taking the calls, which takes some of the heat out of the exchange. Keep in mind that a manager works for the association and is not a neutral mediator. Self-managed boards can get a similar result by putting everything in writing, following the same steps every time, and using formal dispute resolution when a conflict will not settle.

No single point of contact

Without a management office, owners call whichever director they know, at whatever hour suits them. Requests get lost, and different directors give different answers. A manager gives owners one place to go. A self-managed board can come close with a shared association email address and phone line, a published response time, and one director or committee assigned to sort the requests.

When self-management works well

Self-management tends to work when most of the following are true:

  • The community is small, with few amenities and little shared infrastructure to maintain.
  • The finances are simple and healthy, with a realistic budget and funded reserves.
  • There is a steady supply of volunteers with time and relevant skills, and a plan for handing duties over.
  • The board is willing to pay professionals for the pieces that need them: a CPA, an attorney, a bookkeeper or accounting service, a reserve study provider and an insurance agent.
  • Owners are generally cooperative and delinquencies are low.

If that sounds like your community, our guide to self-managing your HOA explains how to set it up. If you are still weighing the two approaches, our self-managed vs. professional management decision guide walks through the choice step by step.

How to reduce the risks if you self-manage

  • Build an annual calendar of legal deadlines: meetings, elections, budget mailings, disclosures, tax returns, insurance renewals and corporate filings.
  • Split the money duties. One person approves payments, another signs or releases them, and a third reviews the bank statements and reconciliations.
  • Have the full board review the financial reports every month, and have an outside CPA examine the books every year.
  • Carry directors and officers liability insurance and fidelity (crime) coverage, and review the limits each year with your agent.
  • Keep an attorney who works with associations on call, and budget for it.
  • Write down procedures for collections, violations, architectural requests and vendor bidding, and follow them every time.
  • Keep the association’s records in a shared, backed-up system that belongs to the association, not in one director’s home or personal email.
  • Plan for turnover with written job descriptions and, where your documents allow, staggered terms.

Some associations choose a middle path: they hire a company for accounting and assessment collection only and keep everything else in-house.

What a management company changes, and what it does not

A management company adds trained staff, established systems and experience across many communities. It also adds a fee, and the quality of service varies from company to company and from manager to manager. A manager often handles several communities at once, so a managed association still needs an engaged board that reads the reports, asks questions and holds the company to its contract. The board remains the decision-maker and remains legally responsible.

Our article on what HOA management companies do explains the division of labor, and the HOA management section covers the options in more depth.

In California

The Davis-Stirling Act applies to an association whether it is professionally managed or not, so a self-managed board has to meet these requirements itself:

  • Monthly financial review. Civil Code section 5500 requires the board to review, on a monthly basis, account reconciliations, actual results against the budget, bank statements, an income and expense statement, the check register, the general ledger and delinquency reports. Section 5501 lets a subcommittee of the treasurer and at least one other director do this outside a meeting if the board ratifies the review at its next meeting and records it in the minutes.
  • Annual budget report. Civil Code section 5300 requires the association to distribute an annual budget report 30 to 90 days before the end of its fiscal year.
  • CPA review. Civil Code section 5305 requires a review of the financial statement by a licensee of the California Board of Accountancy for any fiscal year in which gross income exceeds $75,000, distributed to the members within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
  • Fidelity coverage. Civil Code section 5806 requires crime or fidelity coverage for directors, officers and employees in an amount at least equal to the association’s reserves plus three months of assessments, unless the governing documents require more. It must include computer fraud and funds transfer fraud.
  • Reserve study. Civil Code section 5550 requires a reserve study with a visual inspection of the major components at least once every three years, where the replacement value of those components is at least half of the gross budget excluding reserves, and an annual review of the study.

Insurance also affects directors personally. Civil Code section 5800 limits the personal liability of volunteer directors and officers for certain claims, but only if several conditions are met. One is that the association carries general liability and directors and officers coverage of at least $500,000 for a development of 100 or fewer separate interests, or $1,000,000 for a larger one.

Finally, Business and Professions Code section 11501 states that an association is not required to hire a paid manager unless its governing documents require one. For the bigger picture, see our overview of California HOA law.

The Law Behind This Article

Every legal point in this article comes from the official text. Each link below opens it in a new tab.

Civil Code sections: 5300 · 5305 · 5500 · 5501 · 5550 · 5800 · 5806

Business and Professions Code sections: 11501

Other sources: Foundation for Community Association Research: 2025 Statistical Review

This article is general educational information, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and your association’s governing documents control many of these questions, so check with your association’s attorney or another qualified professional about your situation.

Start here

New to the Board?

Start with what the board is responsible for and what to tackle first.

This page is general educational information, not legal, financial or insurance advice. Laws vary by state and your association's governing documents control many of these questions, so check with your association's attorney or another qualified professional about your situation.